Friday, March 9, 2007

"The Ethics of Living Jim Crow"

Richard Wright’s, “The Ethics of Living Jim Crow” is an autobiography of Wright’s life and the hardships he faced growing up in a time of discrimination and racism. The amount of racism that Wright encountered as a child was disgusting to read about, but he talked about it as if it were any other topic. Wright talked about how it was difficult to grow up and live in a time like this and gives the reader a clear idea of what it was like to be at the receiving end of racism. He wrote his autobiography about his younger years growing up in this difficult time and the discrimination he faced in the work atmosphere as well as his own neighborhood.
Wright’s way of writing was not as “graphic” as Frederick Douglas’ was. I felt as though Wright was simply telling his life story and experiences, and not going into details of the abuse he faced. While reading Frederick Douglas’ autobiography, I found it very difficult to read at many times due the graphic descriptions he gave of beatings that he felt and witnessed. Wright took a different way of approaching the topic of racism, but they were also at different times. Douglas was a slave and was abused, while Wright was a young boy living in a town where racism was at its highest, but there were no slaves anymore. However, Wright’s style of writing still was interesting to me. While reading his story, you could tell that Wright did not want to be pitied for his experiences and was not looking for help in any sense. He talked about racism as if it were any other topic that is discussed and his style of writing was very nonchalant. I feel that he wrote this way to tell the realness of things, and how racism WAS viewed as something that was normal for the time. It was common at this time to discriminate, and was almost expected during this time.
Many times throughout Wright’s story he speaks about the idea of being “lucky.” He repeats this time and time again through the voices of his African American characters. I feel that they used this term “lucky” as a way to get through their hardest times and relate the idea of being lucky to having someone watching out for them, such as a religious figure. I got this feeling when I read this because I feel that the African American’s as a whole did not have a lot of hope because no one in society cared about them or their well being. They were constantly discriminated against and their voices meant little to nothing in any affair. This idea of being “lucky” was not common and when it was applied to African Americans it meant a lot. I feel that they turned to religion as a guidance to get them through life, and it was some kind of god that they believed in that would save them and they’d be lucky to still have their life, or whatever the situation may be. Specifically, there was an incident that Wright wrote about where there was a group of white boys were picking on him and were saying hurtful things to him. The boys left Wright and told him he was “lucky” that they were going to leave him alone and not kill him. To Wright and other African Americans at this time it was very common for them to receive death threats such as this one, but they considered themselves lucky to escape them. I think religion played an important role in their lives due to the amount of discrimination they faced, because they had no one else to look after them, especially in times of need.

4 comments:

AmandaKL said...

I also noticed that Wright's style of writing was very different from Frederick Douglass's when writing about similar situations. Both were African American's living in a tough time. Like you said, Douglass was very graphic, and it was scary for me to read it (I kept finding my jaw dropping). Wright however seemed more matter of factly, but still made the reader feel for him without really complaining. There is no way that I can imagine living in a time like that whether I was black or white. Wright really wrote an interesting piece that showed some scary truths about the life of African Americans even after they were freed from slavery. The saddest part for me was how the white guys who he worked with tricked him into a no win situation, and I knew that no one else was going to stick up for him or believe what he said just because it was a white man's work versus a black man's word.

Stephanie said...

Kathryn,
I like how you brought your own insight and perspective to Wright’s piece. I didn’t connect the themes of being lucky with religious beliefs, but I think you have a really good argument. History is full of examples of how religion did play such a huge role in African Americans lives. And I think you did a great job of connecting the dots to where this could be seen in Wright’s piece, even if it was never spelled out.

MattyB said...

Kathryn, I found it really interesting that I read the reading with such a different perspective than you. I felt that Wright's writing style was almost a more modern version of Douglass'. He uses graphic and personal experiences about racism similarly to how Douglass used examples from his life about slavery in order to derive a reaction out of his readers and inspire change.
Your argument about religion is a really interesting one I hadn't thought about with this reading. We haven't really talked very much about religion and its role in slavery, but slaveholders would encourage Christianity in their slaves for two reasons. One, it made themselves feel like they were "saving" the slaves from eternal damnation and two, slaves looked to God for hope because none existed anywhere else, and it kept them going. Slaves identified with the enslavement of the Jews, and felt that one day God would free them. I think this carries over to Wright's persistence and hope.

Jess said...

Kathryn,
I feel that maybe Wright did not go into the same type of intricate details in his story as Douglas had, for he actually wrote his piece of writing. He did not make up or embellish on events that he could not quite remember, as we said that Douglas had. As we had discussed in class, Douglas could have had someone else help him to write his piece, and if Wright wrote his own, this would account for the immense differences that are present between the two when it comes to the fine points. I feel that Wright’s tale is more factual. I also agree that since Douglas was a slave and Wright was not, their lives differed as a result. When I read the story, I did not think of contrasting and comparing the lives of these two writers, but I liked that you did. It put a new perspective on Wright’s “Autobiographical Sketch”.